What distinguishes original main motions from incidental main motions?

• A. Only original main motions can be amended
• B. Incidental motions can only be discussed in committee
• C. Objection to consideration can only be applied to original main motions
• D. Only incidental motions require a second to be considered

Answer: (C)

The distinction between original main motions and incidental main motions is critical in parliamentary procedure. Original main motions are the initial proposals made by a member during a meeting and serve to introduce new business. On the other hand, incidental motions are secondary motions that arise out of the business being discussed, with the purpose of helping to facilitate or manage the main motion.

The correct answer highlights that "objection to consideration" applies solely to original main motions. This means that members can object to the consideration of a main motion when it is first introduced, which can prevent the motion from being debated or voted upon. This rule is designed to protect the assembly from spending time on motions that are deemed inappropriate or unworthy of consideration at that moment.

In contrast, incidental motions do not have this objection process as they are meant to address specific issues related to the main motion without introducing new substantive ideas. Therefore, they are considered automatically due to their nature of supporting or addressing the main motion that is already under discussion. This unique characteristic of original main motions concerning objections to consideration distinguishes them from incidental motions.